<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Navarro Roofing Sucks &#187; Roofing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/category/roofing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com</link>
	<description>Tucson, Arizona</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:45:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A professional&#8217;s opinion</title>
		<link>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/a-professionals-opinion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/a-professionals-opinion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roofing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, my name is (withheld) and I am a roofing contractor down in New Smyrna Beach, FL.
Don’t worry I&#8217;m not trying to advertise my company. I just want to say it really sucks that they have done a piss poor job; it is contractors like them that make my everyday job that much harder. I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, my name is (withheld) and I am a roofing contractor down in New Smyrna Beach, FL.<br />
Don’t worry I&#8217;m not trying to advertise my company. I just want to say it really sucks that they have done a piss poor job; it is contractors like them that make my everyday job that much harder. I first have to convince the homeowner I&#8217;m not here to scam them and that I&#8217;m an actual licensed roofing contractor.</p>
<p>It’s a shame most homeowners concerns is that you won’t leave them in a worse position then they are already in. After you do all that, then you can finally do what you came there to do in the first place.</p>
<p>I will say this, I know in today’s economy people are pinching pennies, but trust me when I tell you cutting costs on your roof is not the way to go, in fact it is your roof that protects everything we work hard for right? I&#8217;m glad to see someone call these sorry pieces of *#^! out and hold them responsible for their actions. GREAT JOB!!!! Thanks for letting me vent on your web page. I needed that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/a-professionals-opinion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Engineered to Fail.  Built to Leak.</title>
		<link>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/engineered-to-fail-built-to-leak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/engineered-to-fail-built-to-leak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 02:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roofing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roofers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuscon construction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 
About five years ago we called a contractor to reapply the Elastomeric roof coating. We had recently bought the house and knew it needed maintenance. There were no leaks of any type. The contractor informed us that the built-up roof looked like it was old and it should probably be replaced. We were referred [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/36.jpg" alt="Navarro Leaky Roof" width="400" height="300" border="1" /> </p>
<p align="left">About five years ago we called a contractor to reapply the Elastomeric roof coating. We had recently bought the house and knew it needed maintenance. There were no leaks of any type. The contractor informed us that the built-up roof looked like it was old and it should probably be replaced. We were referred to Navarro Roofing by a trusted neighbor and realtor who said his company used Navarro Roofing for all their roofing, so we felt if Navarro Roofing was good enough for the realty company, they should be OK. They were wrong and the realtor has since stopped using Navarro Roofing upon our recommendation.<br />
Navarro Roofing sold us on replacing the composite roof with good quality fiberglass shingles so that we would not have to maintain it like we did the composite roof. It cost $1000-$1500 more, but we thought it would be worth it. We were wrong.</p>
<p align="justify">When Navarro arrived to remove the existing roof, rather than using our driveway, they backed their stake truck up on our yard – right over our main sewer line. Navarro denied they parked the truck there despite the dual tire tracks from the street through the yard up to the side of the house. There was no immediate problem, but within a month there were constant sewer backups and a scope revealed crushed sewer tiles where the truck was “not parked.” It cost us over $3000 to replace the line.</p>
<p align="justify">Navarro Roofing made a mess of our yard. After the job was “completed,” there were pieces of shingle, globs of tar, roofing nails and construction debris all over the place. It took us four hours to remove the tar stains from the patios, walkways outdoor furniture and our dog! Inexcusable! It was the weekend and no one was available and we were tracking tar all over the place, so we cleaned it up ourselves. Thanks Navarro Roofing.</p>
<p align="justify">The roof looked good from ground level, but the inadequacies of the crew and their <span style="color: blue;">shabby construction methods </span> were hidden from view. <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/36.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(Photo #36)</span></a></p>
<p align="justify">When the first monsoon struck, after about the third day of rain, the ceiling below the roof mounted evaporative cooler became saturated and leaked terribly. We called the HVAC contractor who installed the cooler and complained that the cooler was overflowing and leaking into the house. He said it was impossible because it was sealed and would only leak on to the roof. He came out and upon inspection informed us that when the new roof was installed the roofing contractor <span style="color: blue;">Navarro Roofing</span> failed to replace the flashing around the cooler mounting. THERE WAS NO FLASHING AT ALL! No flashing, no sealant, no nothing! Just a straight shot from the outdoors into our attic! Water had been pouring in, soaking the insulation and saturating the sheetrock. We had to replace the flashing, dry out the attic, replace the ceiling and insulation, and clean the carpet. Cost: $1200. Thanks Navarro Roofing!</p>
<p align="justify">There are leaks at two other areas where Navarro should have removed and replaced flashing when the old roof was removed. One area was simply <span style="color: blue;">never</span> <span style="color: blue;">replaced</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/16.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(Photo #16)</span></a>, another done very poorly, and <span style="color: blue;">another around the chimney</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/43.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #43)</span></a> was ignored, using <span style="color: blue;">tar for sealant</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/40.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo #40)</span></a><span style="color: red;"><a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/40.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]">,</a> </span><span style="color: blue;">which eventually failed</span><span style="color: red;"> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/38.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]">(</a></span><a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/38.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">Photo #38)</span></a> instead of doing it properly. Failing to replace the first and second areas have lead to <span style="color: blue;">rot </span><a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/02.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #2)</span></a> and the chimney alone has caused major interior damage to the amount of $800. Instead of doing it correctly, they globbed some tar sealant on it. Shoddy construction methods – <span style="color: blue;">engineered to fail </span><a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/42.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #42)</span></a> and <span style="color: blue;">built to leak</span>! <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/38.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #38)</span></a> How lazy can you be? This <span style="color: blue;">drip edge </span><a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/28.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #28)</span></a> is lifting between the fir strip and fascia because it’s not nailed down. Thanks Navarro Roofing!</p>
<p align="justify">The real damage caused by Navarro Roofing’s <span style="color: blue;">poor workmanship and building practices</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/35.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #35)</span></a> appeared later. Navarro improperly installed <span style="color: blue;">three valleys</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/14.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #14)</span></a> that have caused <span style="color: blue;">major leaks </span><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #1)</span> and interior damage. Two separate interior areas at opposite ends of the house require repairs estimated at $2000. The third has caused <span style="color: blue;">cosmetic and structural damage</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/07.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #7)</span></a>. YES, that’s <span style="color: blue;">the sky you see</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/33.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #33)</span></a> though the gaping whole is <span style="color: blue;">another quality Navarro roof</span>. <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/17.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #17)</span></a></p>
<p align="justify">No one was willing to repair the damage without replacing the entire roof at the cost of $10,800, including replacement of the <span style="color: blue;">rotted roof sheeting</span>, <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/30.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #30)</span> </a>the <span style="color: blue;">tongue and groove</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/33.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #33)</span></a> and <span style="color: blue;">structural rafters</span>. <span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"><a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/29.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"> #29</a> &amp; <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/46.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]">46</a>)</span>
  </p>
</p>
<p align="justify">At this point what remains of the Navarro roof is about six years old, one year out of warranty and far short of the shingle manufacturer’s 25 year warranty. Three licensed roofing contractors assessed the roof and every one of them remarked that the <span style="color: blue;">shingles appeared to be 15-20 years old</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/05.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #5)</span></a> and in need of replacement. They stated that a majority of them have “<span style="color: blue;">marbling lines</span>” <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/10.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #10)</span></a> or a <span style="color: blue;">marble texture</span>, <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/13.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #13)</span></a> as well as <span style="color: blue;">curling corners</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/05.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #5)</span></a> and <span style="color: blue;">edges</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/03.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #3)</span></a> – all signs of old shingles! Unfortunately, the marbling does not show up well in <span style="color: blue;">photographs</span>,<span style="color: red;"> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/25.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]">(</a></span><a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/25.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;">#25)</span></a> but I saved hundreds of them in the hope that Navarro Roofing would stand up to the manufacturer and defend their construction practices and workmanship.</p>
<p align="justify">But that has not been the case. We have contacted <span style="color: blue;">Navarro Roofing</span> several times but is has done no good. We gave them ample opportunity to correct their errors, bad work and poor construction. We were either ignored or told that we are responsible for the failure of the roof, yet they offered no proof. They basically told us it’s out of warranty and we could contact the shingle manufacturer. We disagree and feel if that’s the way they do work and “stand behind it,” then they should tell people that. If they won’t, then we will! </p>
<p align="justify">By the way, TAMKO BUILDING PRODUCTS (<span style="color: blue;">www.tamko.com</span>), the shingle manufacturer, will not stand behind the warranty of the shingles saying that the <span style="color: blue;">warranty is void</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/19.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #19)</span></a> because of “<span style="color: blue;">poor or improper application or installation.”</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/06.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #6)</span></a> They said “the application was applied incorrectly.” Whatever the hell that means!? Regardless, it doesn’t say much about you when your own work voids a manufacturer’s warranty! But I guess that’s not something you put on your business card…</p>
<p align="justify">TAMKO also offers some other insight that Navarro Roofing might want to consider. <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/GlassSeal_EliteApp.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="color: blue;">TAMKO’s own Application Instructions</span></a> recommend Valley Application in a weave rather than the metal W valleys Navarro Roofing installed. It may be why <span style="color: blue;">all the valleys Navarro Roofing installed have failed</span>! <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/46.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #46)</span></a></p>
<p>We have learned a lot about roofs from the professionals who refused to repair <span style="color: blue;">Navarro Roofing’s poor work</span>. <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/04.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #4)</span></a>
  </p>
</p>
<div align="justify">
<ul style=" text-align: left;" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: blue;">The roof was engineered to fail. </span>The roofers who gave us quotes on      repairing Navarro’s roof all refused to do so. All of them said they would never put a      shingle room on a roof with such a low pitch. The City of Tucson Building Inspector said that the      minimum pitch for a shingle roof is 2/12, but that code states that a roof      with this pitch requires double underlayment. It would have been nice if Navarro      Roofing would read and follow local and international building codes. They didn’t, but the ROC (<a href="http://www.azroc.gov/">www.azroc.gov</a>) will only address claims      within two years of construction.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: blue;">The roof was built to leak. </span><a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/08.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #8)</span></a> That’s a roofing nail you see hanging      there.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Navarro      Roofing’s quote calls for two-ply 30# underlayment. We can’t find any. That is <span style="color: blue;">bare      roof sheeting</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/37.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #37)</span></a> you see <span style="color: blue;">between the gaps in the shingle</span>.<span style="color: red;"> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/21.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]">(</a></span><a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/21.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #21)</span></a> </li>
<li class="MsoNormal">If you      build it poorly, <span style="color: blue;">the underlying structure will      fail</span>.<span style="color: red;"> (</span><a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/47.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #47)</span></a> </li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: blue;">Roof</span><span style="color: blue;"> Valleys</span><span style="color: blue;"> are not Navarro Roofing’s strong suit!</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/42.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #42)</span></a> They are engineered to fail and built to      leak. According to the pros, if you      are going to use the W Channel and not the manufacturer’s recommended      method, then you must seal the top of the valley with roofing cement to      prevent debris and water from being blown up and settling there during      strong storms. </li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Three roof valleys failed for various reasons, but the most significant reason is that in the words of one roofing expert, “they were built to leak.” Take a look at the two sides of this <span style="color: blue;">valley </span><a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/14.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #14)</span></a>. The roofing pros we brought in after the we developed significant leaks and Navarro Roofing essentially told us to go f*** ourselves, say that the left-hand side of this valley is done properly (one said never use “W channel”, only weave shingles to avoid failure, something the manufacturer also recommends). <span style="color: blue;">The right-hand side is built to leak.</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/17.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #17)</span></a> The left-hand side has two layers that overlap the entire length of the valley. It’s crooked as hell and looks like crap, <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/45.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #45)</span></a> but it is apparently the proper way to construct if you are not using the method the manufacturer recommends. This overlapping has apparently helped prevent failure. However, the right-hand side is built with gaps between a single layer of shingle. <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/15.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #15)</span></a> The left-hand side is apparently “roofing 101”, at which Navarro Roofing has failed miserably at the customer’s expense. We have to wonder, if they knew how to do it the right way, and the two sides of the valley are totally different, wouldn’t you think someone would know one of them is wrong? Of course they did! They just didn’t care! They did inferior work, and didn’t give a crap! Thanks Navarro!</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Note      the <span style="color: blue;">clean lines</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/45.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #45)</span></a> along the roof valleys! The <span style="color: blue;">gaps</span><span style="color: red;"> (</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"><a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/17.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"> #17</a>, <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/18.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]">18</a>, <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/19.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]">19</a>)</span> allow <span style="color: blue;">leaves and debris to      gather at the gaps</span>. <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/22.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #22)</span></a> The bent channels <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/23.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #23)</span></a> don’t help either. Looking downward from the peak, the      gapped side (now on the left) collects debris and channels water into the      gaps. <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/41.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #41)</span></a> Heavy rainfall flowing      down the roof valley catches the points of the shingles and runs horizontally      along the top edge and <span style="color: blue;">under the shingles</span>. <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/39.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #39)</span></a> If the underlayment were installed as      per the contract, it would slow the progression of the leakage and rot,      but probably only to the point where it would be out of warranty! Regardless, if the roof is so <span style="color: blue;">poorly constructed</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/21.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #21)</span></a> as our roof was, then      the <span style="color: blue;">unprotected roof sheeting will ultimately      fail</span>.<span style="color: red;"> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/37.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]">(</a></span><a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/37.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #37)</span></a> </li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Flashing      is a critical component of the roofing system and if Navarro Roofing would      have <span style="color: blue;">reinstalled pieces they removed</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/05.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #5)</span></a> then those points would not have <span style="color: blue;">failed</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/16.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo #16)</span></a><span style="color: red;"> </span>either!</li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: blue;">Chimney flashing</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/43.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #43)</span></a> is also critical. <span style="color: blue;">Glopping tar</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/40.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #40)</span></a> on top of <span style="color: blue;">old flashing</span> <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/44.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #44)</span></a> is inexcusable. Interior leaks require $800      repairs. Caulking along the shingles      and step flashing is just <span style="color: blue;">shoddy workmanship and      poor construction practices</span>. <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/38.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #38)</span></a> Why not do it right?</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">In      spite the horrific results of the job, apparently someone on the crew had      some knowledge of construction practices. Unfortunately they method is not what the manufacturer recommends      and thus the 25 Year Warranty is void. Some parts are functional, but ugly! <span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"><a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/31.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"> #31</a> &amp; <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/34.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]">#34</a>)</span> Ironically the valley      termination was engineered to fail and did! <a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/imagez/32.jpg" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[15]"><span style="color: red;">(</span><span style="color: red;">Photo </span><span style="color: red;"> #32)</span></a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div align="justify">Thanks for putting up this site and letting the world know what kind of work Navarro does! In closing I only have two more things to say…Buyer beware; and I agree, NAVARRO ROOFING SUCKS!</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/engineered-to-fail-built-to-leak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navarro Roofing &#8211; Tucson Arizona &#8211; Sucks!</title>
		<link>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/navarro-roofing-tucson-arizono-sucks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/navarro-roofing-tucson-arizono-sucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 07:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roofing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaky roof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repair work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shingles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tucson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/navarro-roofing-tucson-arizono-sucks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Navarro Roofing Co Inc
3214 E Pennsylvania St
Tucson, AZ 85714
(520) 741-9232
Workmanship is Shoddy, Leaks Galor, No Honor.
Do Not Use This Company.
Call and tell them they SUCK!
Navarro Roofing was hired by us to put a complete roof on our home. They were told to replace all old particle board as well as any water damaged plywood with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Navarro Roofing Co Inc<br />
3214 E Pennsylvania St<br />
Tucson, AZ 85714<br />
(520) 741-9232</p>
<p><strong>Workmanship is Shoddy, Leaks Galor, No Honor.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Do Not Use This Company.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Call and tell them they SUCK!</strong></p>
<p>Navarro Roofing was hired by us to put a complete roof on our home. They were told to replace all old particle board as well as any water damaged plywood with new plywood. We paid for the wood and work but found out later that they did not replace all the particle board or five other soft spots caused by prior leaks on the old plywood. Next thing they did poorly was the application of the shingles as they started with crooked lines and at the north west corner of the roof the shingles overlay each other where only 2-3 inch strips of shingles are visible and looks very bad. In addition they improperly installed the roof valley gutters so that leaks are currently staining an open beam and wood ceiling in the family room and kitchen as well as the sheet rock in the dining room. We have had another roofing contractor out to look so we know what the problems are. They didn&#8217;t properly seal around the fireplace so we get additional leakage from that into the kitchen. They did a poor job on the split level roof area that we had to pay another contractor additional to stop the leaks on the front porch, an open wood ceiling. They slammed packages of shingles and tar paper down on the roof so hard that in one room the ceiling sheet rock was loosened. We had the Facia board replaced by Navarro and on the ends of the roof they used shorter lengths scabbed together instead of buying the proper full length 2&#215;8s, So now we have sagging on the ends. To add insult to injury they then didn&#8217;t replace several of the roof vent covers so old roofing got into the bathroom fans and they had to be replaced. They also replaced one roof hood by bending an old metal sign and screwing it over the vent. Yes, we notified them of the problems and they have <strong>refused</strong> to correct the problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/navarro-roofing-tucson-arizono-sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Showroom</title>
		<link>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/visit-the-showroom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/visit-the-showroom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 22:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roofing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navarro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/visit-the-showroom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/visit-the-showroom/navarro-roofing-showroom/" rel="attachment wp-att-12" title="Navarro Roofing Showroom"><img src="http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/navarro-roofing-showroom.jpg" alt="Navarro Roofing Showroom" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/visit-the-showroom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navarro Roofing Overpriced</title>
		<link>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/navarro-roofing-overpriced/</link>
		<comments>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/navarro-roofing-overpriced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roofing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buildup composite roof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Built up composit roofing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elastic rubber roof coats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kool Koat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I called Navarro because they were highly rated on Angie&#8217;s List. I needed repairs to my flat roof which was leaking in 2 places. Carlos at Navarro came out and looked at the roof. He submitted an estimate of over $7500, including a coat of emulsion and 2 coats of paint. I later contracted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 10pt"><o:p> </o:p>I called Navarro because they were highly rated on Angie&#8217;s List. I needed repairs to my flat roof which was leaking in 2 places. Carlos at Navarro came out and looked at the roof. He submitted an estimate of over $7500, including a coat of emulsion and 2 coats of paint. I later contracted with a different roofer, who pointed out that the roof did not need recoating, that even if it did, emulsion would serve no purpose. The cost to repair the skylights and drains, which is what I really needed, was $1250. It is possible that Navarro does good work, but anyone considering using them should get at least 2 more estimates. It seems likely that they will inflate an estimate with unnecessary work.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/navarro-roofing-overpriced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Location of Navarro Roofing</title>
		<link>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/location-of-navarro-sucks-roofing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/location-of-navarro-sucks-roofing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roofing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[View Larger Map
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="425" height="350" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" src="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&#038;hl=en&#038;geocode=&#038;q=3214+E+Pennsylvania+St+Tucson,+AZ+85714&#038;sll=37.0625,-95.677068&#038;sspn=44.118686,96.328125&#038;ie=UTF8&#038;ll=32.181206,-110.919771&#038;spn=0.001446,0.00294&#038;t=h&#038;z=14&#038;layer=c&#038;cbll=32.170273,-110.929041&#038;output=embed&#038;s=AARTsJpDkNaK5SkKDngvkcoKrcZUZWyabA"></iframe><br /><small><a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&#038;hl=en&#038;geocode=&#038;q=3214+E+Pennsylvania+St+Tucson,+AZ+85714&#038;sll=37.0625,-95.677068&#038;sspn=44.118686,96.328125&#038;ie=UTF8&#038;ll=32.181206,-110.919771&#038;spn=0.001446,0.00294&#038;t=h&#038;z=14&#038;layer=c&#038;cbll=32.170273,-110.929041&#038;source=embed" style="color:#0000FF;text-align:left">View Larger Map</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/location-of-navarro-sucks-roofing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navarro Roofing of Tucson Stay Away</title>
		<link>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/navarro-roofing-of-tucson-stay-away/</link>
		<comments>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/navarro-roofing-of-tucson-stay-away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roofing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cool Cote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elastic rubber roof coatings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flashing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaky roof]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Navarro installed a 3-ply built-up roof system. 25# base layer with two 14# layers each layer hot-mopped. 90# wrap on parapet walls. New metal drip edge. Cut in two new skylights and replaced a third existing skylight. The interior square footage of our house is 1600 ft, plus large covered patio and a car port. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Navarro installed a 3-ply built-up roof system. 25# base layer with two 14# layers each layer hot-mopped. 90# wrap on parapet walls. New metal drip edge. Cut in two new skylights and replaced a third existing skylight. The interior square footage of our house is 1600 ft, plus large covered patio and a car port. One coat of roof emulsion and 2 coats white elastomeric roof coating.  Estimate: $7,100  Final cost was higher than estimate.</p>
<p>The initial call, estimate, and scheduling was excellent. They provided a paper on how to prepare our house and what to expect in terms of noise and smell. We rearranged our schedules to have the house ready and called in the morning to see when they would arrive. We were told between 7 and 7:30. They did not arrive and I was told that the crew had been sent to another job. They asked if they could do our house the following day. I agreed as long as I had some compensation for the inconvenience. There was a verbal agreement to compensate the installation of the two new skylights which were not in the original estimate. They were on time the next day. I needed to correct the placement of the skylights three times and they needed to return to finish cleaning the gutters, finish an open corner, reconnect conduit and free an electrical box that was tarred closed. The finished product is very good, so far, but they refused to acknowledge our verbal agreement and charged for the skylights.</p>
<p>Give a customer SOME consideration after a failure on your part!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/navarro-roofing-of-tucson-stay-away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navarro is the Worst</title>
		<link>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/navarro-is-the-worst/</link>
		<comments>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/navarro-is-the-worst/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Roofing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overpriced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replaced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[very rude]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Navarro tore off my old roof and installed a new one for about $4,000. We are not real happy with their work. They didn&#8217;t remove any of the old shingles. They were very rude. There is an area we need replaced and they don&#8217;t want to back up their work.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Navarro tore off my old roof and installed a new one for about $4,000. We are not real happy with their work. They didn&#8217;t remove any of the old shingles. They were very rude. There is an area we need replaced and they don&#8217;t want to back up their work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.navarroroofingsucks.com/navarro-is-the-worst/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
